Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
161. War decs : not achieving objectives - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: That is not what I asked you. Salvos, stop being Salvos for ten second, and link the question because I have no idea what you talking about.
- by Jeremiah Saken - at 2017.03.16 17:12:44
|
162. War decs : not achieving objectives - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Jeremiah Saken wrote: If a player goes NPC, currently, they pay nothing, whilst the wardecer loses their wardec investment. Is that fair? Going to a war should be riskless? Found, sorry was about to answer but there...
- by Jeremiah Saken - at 2017.03.16 17:03:44
|
163. War decs : not achieving objectives - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: You have ignored and not responded to my questions to you. Dont expect me to answer yours till you have answered mine. What?
- by Jeremiah Saken - at 2017.03.16 16:58:20
|
164. War decs : not achieving objectives - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: 2) Yes, there are Corps which specialize in wardeccing Corps inorder to intercept their transit along major trade lanes. Nothing wrong with that. They pay to do so. Where is the risk in that activity? Constant wardecc of ...
- by Jeremiah Saken - at 2017.03.16 16:37:26
|
165. Sticky:Dev blog: PLEX Changes On The Way! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
PLEX prices are rising, but they started 3 days ago before this devblog. Care to explain CCP? You have a leak? Someone gain from knowing this before?
- by Jeremiah Saken - at 2017.03.16 16:21:35
|
166. War decs : not achieving objectives - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Black Pedro wrote: Wars are not a "gud fight" machine designed to produce somewhat equal and balanced conflict. That would be Faction Warfare. Wars are just the way fighting is done and the larger competitive game manifests itself in highsec. T...
- by Jeremiah Saken - at 2017.03.16 15:58:09
|
167. War decs : not achieving objectives - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Veyreuth wrote: Also, why fight at all as a defender if it doesn't make a difference in forcing a peace? and if you fight as defender you make sure the war will be prolonged.
- by Jeremiah Saken - at 2017.03.16 15:21:03
|
168. War decs : not achieving objectives - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Black Pedro wrote: I am not so sure. This is already effectively in the game: you are not forced to participate in wars, ever. You can always drop to an NPC corp, hop between corps, or stay in the NPC corp and use chat channels to organize soci...
- by Jeremiah Saken - at 2017.03.16 10:35:42
|
169. War decs : not achieving objectives - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
For now I've only see one proposition worth think of Vincent Athena wrote: The only thing I can see to help the issue: Limit war decs to those groups of players who enjoy that style of game play. One way to do this: A corp can declare itself ne...
- by Jeremiah Saken - at 2017.03.16 08:15:35
|
170. War decs : not achieving objectives - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: If a player goes NPC, currently, they pay nothing, whilst the wardecer loses their wardec investment. Is that fair? Going to a war should be riskless?
- by Jeremiah Saken - at 2017.03.16 08:00:34
|
171. War decs : not achieving objectives - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: My proposal merely puts a cost on avoiding a wardec by going NPC, whereas now it is free. It doesnt change the wardec system itself at all. The NPC corps being at war with their opposite, also doesnt change wardec mechanic...
- by Jeremiah Saken - at 2017.03.16 07:48:27
|
172. War decs : not achieving objectives - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: My proposal: A) Adds a cost to avoiding a wardec by joining an NPC Corp. Currently, it is free. B) Ensures that even in an NPC Corp, you are always at war, instead of in an NPC safety bubble. I thought we all wanted more P...
- by Jeremiah Saken - at 2017.03.16 07:34:52
|
173. Which Marauder is best for L4 missions? - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
hmskrecik wrote: Funny you comment on game balance issues without doing your own homework. I just looked at prices in my region and they are as follows (slightly rounded for better typing):: Incursus - 350 000 Daredevil - 58 000 000 Enyo - 27 ...
- by Jeremiah Saken - at 2017.03.16 06:39:12
|
174. Which Marauder is best for L4 missions? - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
hmskrecik wrote: 1. You are going to buy this ship for the first time. It's now up to you to evaluate if the price is worth the benefit you will get from using this ship. If yes, you buy this ship for this price. If no, you don't buy it. End of...
- by Jeremiah Saken - at 2017.03.15 08:44:52
|
175. Which Marauder is best for L4 missions? - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
hmskrecik wrote: Tractor IS useful. If it isn't to you, that does not prove anything yet. Tell that to guristas rats stay out of the range. Tractor isn't usefull, just because it is to you does not prove anything. We can do this all day......
- by Jeremiah Saken - at 2017.03.14 18:55:11
|
176. Sticky:Dev blog: The future of probe and directional scanning UI - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
We need bigger "recover active probes" button. Probes formation buttons, scan range and "scan" button moved to the top where all other buttons are. Solar system map button back. Icons are good. Circle scan progress on signature is good. Double c...
- by Jeremiah Saken - at 2017.03.14 13:15:00
|
177. Which Marauder is best for L4 missions? - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Rotho Ataru wrote: Price: Who cares? If you aren't losing your ships, price isn't a big deal either way. It's a one time price. Presumably you'll make far more than the price of the ship in the long run. ISK/hr matters more than a one-time pric...
- by Jeremiah Saken - at 2017.03.14 12:18:12
|
178. Which Marauder is best for L4 missions? - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
hmskrecik wrote: I'm not telling that. I ask how many are *you* losing because *you* are bringing this pricing argument. I'm bringing price argument because we can have same or better performance for much less price. hmskrecik wrote: On ...
- by Jeremiah Saken - at 2017.03.14 08:12:29
|
179. Which Marauder is best for L4 missions? - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
hmskrecik wrote: Jeremiah Saken wrote: Don't forget about marauders price. Then cost 10 times than faction BS to manufacture. I can have few rattlesnakes for a one marauder. Yeah? And how many of each you lose a month when running mission...
- by Jeremiah Saken - at 2017.03.13 20:19:09
|
180. Which Marauder is best for L4 missions? - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Sentenced 1989 wrote: How is that relevant? I can have multiple 100's rifters for price of one :D They also do more dps then one, but then again how are you going to pilot it? Everything you posted on your previous post. Why bother with high...
- by Jeremiah Saken - at 2017.03.13 13:52:09
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |